Labels

Mothers

The Internet

Hospitals & Clinics

The International Code,
HIV and breastfeeding

Produced by
IBFAN/ICDC


Labels

Page 2 of 4

Page 1, 3, 4

OF BABIES AND BEARS

The Code forbids the use of baby faces and they have all but disappeared from formula labels. Today, they are replaced with cuddly stuffed animals and cartoon characters. Companies would have us believe that cute and cuddly characters do not "idealise" the use of infant formula. It is questionable, however, what other purpose could be served by the warm and fuzzy feelings generated by these images.

Bears and bottles, a running theme for Nutricia, in Italy, in Russia, in...

 

Nestlé Blue Bear at Hong Kong Baby Fun Show.

Nestlé's pervasive new Blue Bear character now appears all over the world, on all its cereal labels and other promotional material, in different postures and cultural contexts. In Hong Kong and Singapore, Blue Bear eats porridge with chopsticks! In Mexico, Blue Bear is tagged onto street signs. In Singapore, Blue Bear approaches mothers even before their baby is born, inviting mothers-to-be to join Nestlé's Baby World Club, despite that country's prohibition of baby clubs.

These characters then become a running theme through much of the company's promotional material thus boosting brand recognition and consumer loyalty.

Feeding bottle and teat labels, too, should not contain text or pictures that discourage breastfeeding. But most companies still do have labels with cuddly animals, baby faces and mothers lovingly bottle feeding their babies.

Rosco, the brown teddy bear appears not only on labels of Abbott-Ross infant formula and follow-up milks but also is given as gifts to doctors, mothers, and appears in advertisements and on posters. The character has become so widely recognised that company or brand names no longer need to be mentioned.

 

Labels for the same brands vary from country to country. In the United States, where the Code is largely ignored, labels by the four main companies, which market there - Abbott-Ross, Mead Johnson, Nestlé and Wyeth - are notoriously promotional. These same companies behave better elsewhere where labelling requirements inspired by the Code, are stricter. One example is Gerber which has removed its baby face logo from labels in Brazil.

Danone's fuzzy feelings.

 

Friesland bear boosts brand recognition.

 

Mead Johnson's use of Beatrix Potter's Peter Rabbit character in its Enfamil infant formula labelling evokes nostalgia amongst many parents. In the USA, Canada and Puerto Rico, where there are no restrictions on promotion, the baby bunny is depicted with a feeding bottle, while in Mexico and Colombia, which have some regulations, the bottle is omitted.

 

TOO EARLY

The Code applies to all products "marketed or represented . . . as replacements of breastmilk." Subsequent Resolutions have recommended that complementary feeding begins at six months of age. This means cereals, jarred foods, juices, teas and other products should not be promoted for use before six months.

Nestlé, Gerber, Heinz, Milupa, Danone, Dumex, Friesland and Hipp, all market complementary food products for use below six months of age. Many of these labels show baby pictures and do not provide complete and accurate information about the product and its appropriate use.

 

Labels
Page 1

Labels
Page 3